JAMB Releases 2025 UTME Resit Results, Uncovers Widespread Malpractice at CBT Centres
The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has officially released the results of the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) resit, conducted for candidates affected by previous exam disruptions. But beyond the scores, the exercise revealed deep-rooted issues — from widespread cheating to CBT centre fraud.
Why This Matters
This resit wasn’t just about giving students another shot. It exposed a troubling pattern of exam malpractice, raising fresh concerns about the integrity of Nigeria’s university admission system.
Key Actions Taken After the Resit
Following the resit, JAMB convened a high-level review session with Chief External Examiners across the country. Two leading experts — Prof. Olufemi Peters of the National Open University and psychometrician Prof. Boniface Nworgu — were appointed to thoroughly vet the results before public release.
How Different Groups Were Handled
Under-aged Candidates
Results for under-aged candidates with no legal disputes have now been released. However, JAMB reiterated that these candidates remain ineligible for admission, in line with registration policies.
Candidates Involved in Online Cheating (“WhatsApp Runs”)
JAMB released the results of candidates caught using social media cheating rings — but warned that this should not be seen as endorsement. It’s a final caution. Future offenders will face strict penalties.
Absentee Candidates
Those who missed the resit (and the original exam) will have another opportunity during the upcoming mop-up exercise. JAMB is offering one final chance to these candidates.
Sanctions for Compromised CBT Centres
JAMB has blacklisted several Computer-Based Test (CBT) centres for serious misconduct, including tampering with candidate registration data. Legal action may follow for both centre owners and complicit staff members.
Tutorial Centres Under Scrutiny
Some tutorial centres have come under fire for promoting fraudulent exam practices. JAMB has called on government authorities to regulate these centres more strictly to safeguard students and the system.
Why CBT Remains the Gold Standard
Despite identified weaknesses, JAMB reaffirmed that Computer-Based Testing remains the most secure and efficient exam model for Nigeria’s growing candidate population.
Improving Exam Centre Accreditation
To reduce future problems, JAMB may engage independent professional consultants to help review and strengthen its centre accreditation and registration systems.
Addressing Misinformation and Ethnic Sentiments
The Board condemned attempts to politicize the resit or suggest ethnic targeting. JAMB emphasized that exam disruptions and corrective actions were based strictly on verified data — not regional bias.
Commendation for JAMB Leadership
Stakeholders at the review praised JAMB’s leadership for swiftly managing the resit process and maintaining the board’s integrity under pressure.
Resit Results Snapshot
Out of 336,845 candidates scheduled for the resit, 21,082 were absent. According to JAMB, the overall performance remained consistent with historical patterns, with no unusual changes in pass rates.
Misinformation & False Claims Exposed
JAMB debunked online rumors about inflated resit scores. One notable case involved a student from Adekunle Ajasin University who falsely claimed to score 380. His actual result, verified by JAMB, was significantly lower.
Withdrawn Results and Candidate Notifications
Some candidates’ results have been withheld due to ongoing investigations into suspected fraud. Affected students are being notified via SMS, email, and JAMB portal updates. Those not contacted have nothing to worry about and do not need to recheck.
Clarifying SMS Charges
JAMB clarified that it earns no revenue from the SMS shortcodes (55019/66019) used to check results. The service is subsidized to protect students from cyber café exploitation.
Shocking Malpractice Techniques Uncovered
Over 3,000 candidates have been linked to severe malpractice, including:
- Hacking CBT centre networks
- Using AI to alter facial images
- Fingerprint manipulation across multiple candidates
- Hiring impersonators (“mercenaries”) to write exams
JAMB warns these candidates risk total result cancellation as investigations progress.
National Collaboration & Appreciation
JAMB thanked several institutions for their support, including security agencies, WAEC, Ahmadu Bello University, TRCN, and NECO. The Board reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining transparency, fairness, and national standards in university admissions.
For the official press release from JAMB, You can read the full press release published by JAMB here.
Bottom Line
JAMB’s 2025 resit was more than just a second chance — it was a wake-up call. The Board is taking a tough stance against malpractice while protecting genuine candidates. Students are strongly urged to stay informed, avoid shortcuts, and trust the process.
You may also like to read: JAMB Announces Mop-Up Exam for 2025 UTME: Missed the Test? Here’s Your Second Chance
